CA Corridors December statistics

Russ JacksonJanuary 23, 20102 Mins read266

Reported by DAVID B. KUTROSKY, Managing Director, Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority
NOTE: This article contains important future state financial information that Mr. Kutrosky discussed at the RailPAC-NARP Sacramento meeting, which will have impact on the state operated trains.

The Capitol Corridor December 2009 results are mixed with a continued ridership decline compared to December 2008, but for the second month in a row revenue was above the prior year with a strong on-time performance (OTP) result as well. With monthly ridership declines beginning to subside and positive revenue results, these indicators are pointing towards a recovery in service performance for the Capitol Corridor. As stated previously, the Capitol Corridor is being negatively impacted by the poor economic conditions in Northern California region (primarily high unemployment) as well as the continuing “Friday Furloughs”, in which state Government offices are closed three (3) Fridays per month (reducing Capitol Corridor ridership by 3% – 5%).

Of significant concern is the Governor’s gas tax swap in the proposed FY010-11 State Budget. This swap would eliminate the Public Transportation Account (PTA) and replace it with increased excise gas tax. In this proposal, operating funds would be available to support the state’s 3 intercity train services with remaining PTA funds for two years through FY 2011-12; however, starting in FY 2012-13 the financing for the operation of the these trains would have to compete with services in the General Fund.
Since this proposal would basically eliminate the only dedicated funding source for the state’s intercity passenger rail program, it could thereby jeopardize the State’s current and future FRA High Speed/Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Program capital grant applications as one of the key requirements to receive grant funds is to identify long-term dedicated operating funds for the Capitol Corridor and the other intercity passenger rail services. Staff is working with transit agencies and other affected parties to defeat this proposal.

Capitol Corridor (December 2009):

Ridership: 122,649 riders; -5.8% vs. Dec 2008; -9.1% vs. prior YTD; -5.6% vs. FY10 Plan; +6% annual growth compared to 2 years ago

Revenue: +0.9%vs. Dec 2008; -1.0% vs. prior YTD; -4.1% vs. FY10 Plan

On-Time Performance: #1 in the Amtrak system at 93% (YTD = 93%); even with a poor start to the month, UPRR did an outstanding job to close out the month on top

System Operating Ratio: 47% YTD vs. 48% in FY09; expenses are stable, increased revenue has improved the ratio

The Capitol Corridor route still continues to be third busiest route in the country, with ridership at 1.56 million for the last 12 months

_______________________________________________

Pacific Surfliners (December 2009):

Ridership: 188,831 passengers; -3.6% vs. Dec 2008, and -3.9% vs. prior YTD; but still the second busiest route in the nation, by a wide margin.

– Ticket Revenue only: +4.2% vs. Dec 2008, and +0.8% vs. prior YTD

On-time performance for December 2009: 82% (YTD FY 2010 on-time performance: 80%)

__________________________________________________

San Joaquins (December 2009):

Ridership: 82,934 passengers +2.5% vs. Dec 2008, and +0.1% v.s prior YTD; one of the few routes in the Amtrak system continuing to have positive results

– Ticket Revenue only: +2.8% vs. Dec 2008, and +4.3% vs. prior YTD

On-time performance for December 2009: 93%, tied with Capitol Corridor top monthly OTP (YTD FY 2010 on-time performance: 92%)
__________________________________________________________

Previous post Great Meeting in Sacramento on January 16, 2010

Next post RailPAC writes Senator Boxer re Amtrak Board