The 2024 California State Rail plan was released in January 2025. The state rail plan is a comprehensive vision by CalSTA of California’s future rail network. While outlining a comprehensive vision RailPAC, while strongly supporting the majority of the Plan initiatives, feels it has some shortcomings that will leave California short of offering the network it aspires to, that travelers can ride today in Switzerland.
That is the reason for the picture, a fully electrified Stadler Intercity KISS trainset traveling on the Swiss Federal Railways, the vision for California.
In the 2nd Quarter 2023 Steel Wheels, RailPAC, based on the draft of the Rail Plan, published its vision of the “stretch goals” needed to move forward. RailPAC’s 2025 update, while similar to the 2023 overview, adjusts for projects completed and modifies some of RailPAC’s recommendations regarding proposed projects to achieve service goals more rapidly. However, like the 2023 RailPAC comments, RailPAC is still disappointed by the slow progress made in delivering expanded service and the infrastructure needed to support that service.
Objective

To create Swiss style clockface regional rail service with local transit connections to provide door to door mobility throughout the region. It should be noted that the whole country of Switzerland would fit between Palm Springs and Santa Barbara and has a system that provides door to door transit with bus connections at 30-minute intervals for most of the country.
Near-Term Construction / Funding
Mid-Term Planning/Funding
Near-Term Service
Mid-Term Service
Long-Term Service

The Los Angeles San Diego San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor is the busiest in the State and second busiest in the nation. However, total passenger ridership from the three services (Amtrak Surfliner, Coaster and Metrolink) is only a few thousand per day, far below the state’s Vehicle Miles Traveled 2045 reduction goals and is way below the potential that the population could support (See Figure 1 below). Since RailPAC and other groups successfully campaigned for the expansion of service in the 1980’s, progress has been painfully slow. While the number of trains has increased, infrastructure improvements lag behind resulting in poor punctuality and reliability. Journey times have not improved since the 1960s. Now, the line’s very existence is in jeopardy from coastal erosion. RailPAC is reiterating its call for a major investment program to upgrade the line to provide a service appropriate for the population and importance of the coastal region.
Near-Term Construction / Planning
Mid-Term Planning / Funding
Near-Term Service Improvements
A strategy that would simplify and somewhat mitigate the overlap of multiple track ownership and service providers would be to more clearly delineate the cities and markets served by each carrier. Under this strategy LOSSAN would provide three classes of service, Economy Coach (unreserved), Reserved Coach and Business Class. The fares for Business Class and Reserved Coach would mirror current Pacific Surfliner fares while Economy Coach would mirror current Metrolink and Coaster fare levels. The Caltrans all-agency Integrated Ticketing System (ITS) would facilitate this three-class service.
Mid-Term Service Improvements
Focus the LOSSAN service on longer distance city pairs (within Metrolink/Coaster Service areas) and local service north of Moorpark and between Laguna Niguel and Oceanside. Coordinated schedules combined with ITS would facilitate transfers from Pacific Surfliner trains and Metrolink/Coaster trains at key transfer stations.
Metrolink’s service area along the corridor would run from Moorpark to Laguna Niguel. Additional Pacific Surfliner frequencies utilizing the current Metrolink track slots would operate north of Moorpark and between Laguna Niguel and Oceanside. As a result, both Metrolink and Coaster’s service area would match county track ownership boundaries.
The expanded three-class Pacific Surfliner service with discount Economy Class would aid in integrating all three services from the customer perspective. It would also bring discount economy service to additional city pairs and riders and expand local service to Ventura and Santa Barbara County.
Long-Term Service Improvements
Objective: An intercity and local passenger train service that is comparable to the London-Birmingham route in the UK
|
2019 CORRIDOR COMPARISONS |
LOS ANGELES – SAN DIEGO |
LONDON – BIRMINGHAM |
|
Route Miles |
128 miles |
112 miles |
|
Population of Combined Metro Areas |
18 million |
11.7 million |
|
Driving Time (no traffic) |
2 hours |
2 hours 30 minutes |
|
Fasted Train Trip |
2 Hours 55 Minutes |
1 hour 22 minutes |
|
Peak Hour Frequency |
1 train/hour |
6 trains/hour |
|
Punctuality |
75% within 5 minutes |
70% within 5 minutes |
|
Average Train Speed |
43 MPH |
81 MPH |
Corridor ID
The Corridor Identification and Development (Corridor ID) Program is a comprehensive intercity passenger rail planning and development program consisting of three discreet steps that will help guide intercity passenger rail development throughout the country and create a pipeline of intercity passenger rail projects ready for implementation.
The Corridor ID initiative for the LOSSAN Corridor is the extension of the corridor to San Ysidro to more directly serve the Tijuana, Mexico Metro area (2.2 million in population) and enhancing the LOSSAN Corridor with more frequencies and improved reliability. The LOSSAN Corridor is currently in Step 1.

Objective
Develop this underutilized right-of-way to benefit tourism, local mobility and commerce. The northern and southern connections into San Jose and Los Angeles are already publicly owned and the owner of the center section of the line, Union Pacific, has very little freight business other than between Oxnard and Los Angeles.
Action
Near-Term Planning / Construction
Mid-Term Planning / Funding
Identify and prioritized selected speed restricted curves for straightening for higher speeds as outlined in plans dating back to the 1960’s. Coastal resiliency investments may provide an opportunity for such right-of-way improvements.
Near-Term Service Improvements
Mid-Term Service Improvements
Corridor ID
The Corridor ID initiative for the Coast Line, LA to the Bay Area, is to provide additional service between San Jose and San Luis Obispo by providing new frequencies along this route segment. These additional frequencies would likely be extensions of current frequencies now terminating at San Jose or San Luis Obispo. These new frequencies would be in addition to Amtrak’s Coast Starlight. The Coast Line is currently in Step 1.

Overview
Amtrak’s long-distance routes provide convenient and in places the only available public transportation for many Californians. Most passengers on long-distance trains are not traveling between major endpoint cities. They are traveling between small and medium size cities, small cities and large cities often connecting at major hub cities to other trains. Many of these city pairs are within California which means travel within the state, while many travelers are visitors from other states, and many more are visitors from overseas. One train of note is the Coast Starlight which serves dozens of California cities the length of California. It also enhances two California corridors, Los Angeles – San Luis Obispo and Salinas – Sacramento and is a placeholder for two other corridors San Luis Obispo – San Jose and Sacramento – Chico.
Service
Long Term Objective
Rolling Stock
It is critical that California provides strong support for the current initiative to replace Amtrak’s long-distance fleet.
Interstate Passenger Rail Compact / Construction
Coordinate with State of Arizona, Sun Valley communities and Riverside County in linking Phoenix/ Tucson and Southern California by forming a Sunset Route Interstate Rail Compact. A key goal is the reroute of the Sunset Limited via Phoenix using Federal Infrastructure funds to rehabilitate the rail line between Wellton and Phoenix.
Objective

To build a northern California rail network, with the busiest sections electrified, in coordination with local and regional transit services to provide door-to-door mobility. The twin cores of the system would be an expanded and improved Capitol Corridor from Sparks NV to Salinas CA, and the ACE/San Joaquin network Chico/Sacramento – Merced (with connections to High-Speed Rail) and Merced to San Jose.
Near-Term Planning / Construction
Capitol Corridor
Altamont Commuter Express (ACE) / San Joaquins
Caltrain/Transportation Authority of Monterey County (TAMC) /
Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART)
Mid-Term Planning / Funding
Capitol Corridor
ACE / San Joaquins
Capitol Corridor / ACE / San Joaquins
Caltrain / SMART
Near-Term Equipment
Near-Term Service Improvements
Mid-Term Service Improvements
Corridor ID
The Corridor ID initiative for the Capitol Corridor is the extension of the corridor to San Francisco to directly serve the SalesForce Transit Center, Reno/Sparks to more directly serve Trans Sierra market and to Salinas to serve Monterey County. It would also enhance the Capitol Corridor with more frequencies. The Capitol Corridor is currently in Step 1.
Another Corridor ID initiative is linking SMART service and the Capitol Corridor with a new service between Suisun and Novato, CA. This initiative is currently in Step 1.
The Corridor ID initiative for the San Joaquin Valley Corridor (ACE and San Joaquins) is the extension of the corridor to Marysville and Chico to serve the Sacramento Valley. This initiative would also enhance the San Joaquin Valley Corridor with more frequencies. The San Joaquin Valley Corridor is currently in Step 1.
Objective

Integrate the Northern California passenger rail network into the High-Speed Rail’s Initial Operating Segment and begin passenger operations. Expedite construction of the rest of the High-Speed Rail system.
Near-Term Management / Construction
Near-Term Service
Near-Term Planning / Engineering
Mid-Term Management / Construction:
Begin concurrent construction of the San Francisco/San Jose to Carlucci Rd and Bakersfield to Palmdale segments.
Mid-Term Service
With the original HSR trainsets shifted to the San Francisco to Palmdale route, explore the acquisition of dual mode high-speed trainsets. This will enable one-seat auto competitive service between Sacramento and Los Angeles.
Near-Term Southern California Planning and Service:
Mid-Term Southern California Planning and Construction
Long-Term Southern California Service
The Transition from Diesel Traction.

Ultimate goal: Efficient Overhead Electrification, is the World standard.
One option to explore is the overhead electrification of key route segments such as key stations along with high-power demand sections (grades). This investment would extend the range of dual mode battery OCS electric rolling stock. This dual mode rolling stock with a modest number of batteries, frequently recharged enroute, and batteries not taxed by high power demand segments have the potential to deliver the best balance of start-up cost, reliability, range and performance while minimizing lineside issues.
Priority electrification routes
LOSSAN Corridor Moorpark – San Diego (electrification facilitates the new long tunnels required along the coast).
Rolling Stock
There is an urgent need to start planning for a replacement of the California Cars. The largest order possible will drive car builder interest and pricing. To generate the largest order possible a standard design for a double-deck car for both intercity and regional, either loco hauled or multiple -unit, is required. For example, the Stadler KISS cars, newly introduced by Caltrain, are available with different interior designs and these different designs are in use as regional trains and intercity trains. The intercity trains offer first-class seating and dining/café car service.
A double- deck car design delivers maximum efficiency and is recommended because of 154 stations in California, only SMART has high level platforms. Systemwide high level boarding is costly and not necessary. A single car design can serve both high-level and low-level platforms. For example, the Stadler KISS cars, used by Caltrain, have doors that serve low-level platforms and doors that serve high-level platforms.
Near-Term
Governance
Multiple crises in Southern California demand a strong focus on moving forward with solutions. The combined existential threats of a transformation in the demand for business and work travel, together with multiple infrastructure failures on the busiest passenger rail route, resulting in line closure for prolonged periods, have highlighted the shortcomings found in the current governance structure. The current structure has been found to be lacking in its ability to move forward to meet the challenges outlined above.
In an effort to address this situation, SB1098, the Southern California Rail Revitalization Act, was passed by the Legislature and signed by the Governor. This act reengages Caltrans Division of Rail to be the lead agency tasked, along a specific timeline, to coordinate planning and prioritization of projects designed to move the LOSSAN Corridor forward. The goal is to improve current services and achieve ridership growth and performance consistent with State Rail Plan goals.
The strong expectation of RailPAC and other stakeholders is that Caltrans will bring strong leadership and a regional perspective for the LOSSAN Corridor megaproject vision and to the decision-making process that has been hampered by local parochial concerns in recent years. To meet this expectation, it is critical that several environmentally approved core capacity projects, vital for Metrolink and LOSSAN reliability and ridership growth, begin construction in the Near-Term.
While the Legislature left the current governance structure intact, local county ownership of rail rights-of-way and multiple JPA’s operating the service, SB1098 tasked Caltrans and corridor stakeholders with exploring alternative management and operations models or structures that improve intercity and regional rail services.
RailPAC Recommends the Following:
Legislature
Other Statewide Initiatives