Home News Archive eNewsletter eNewsletter – May 9, 2011
eNewsletter

eNewsletter – May 9, 2011

Share
Share

It appears at least to this editor that after almost 15 years of planning, economic reality is forcing major replanning for the California High Speed Rail Project. In most cases this seems to be for the best. The possibility of bypassing Palmdale may be motivated to save 30 miles and time to meet the goal of 2 hour and 40 minute running times between Los Angeles and San Francisco with slower speeds in some segments than had been planned. This could be opposed by Los Angeles County Board of Supervisor Michael Antonovich  who is a major supporter of High Speed Rail and has Palmdale in his district. Antonovich is a good example of why High Speed Rail is not a  “Liberal ” issue since he is the most conservative member of the Board of Supervisors. At the very least Antonovich will demand major upgrades for faster Metrolink service in his district. NB  RailPAC eNewsletter for May 9, 2011

Posts by Category

Posts by Year

Related Articles
Newswire

Alstom to build new cars for VIA Rail Canada in Ca$4.7 billion deal

Order for 313 railcars to be built in Ontario and Quebec includes...

Newswire

Skanska-Stacy Witbeck JV wins $2.43bn LA light rail contract

The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LA Metro) has awarded a...

Newswire

Hydrogen failed as car fuel. Now California’s big dollar bet on it for green energy is fading, too

Hydrogen, viewed by its advocates as a clean fuel and a solution...