Home News Archive eNewsletter eNewsletter – May 9, 2011
eNewsletter

eNewsletter – May 9, 2011

Share
Share

It appears at least to this editor that after almost 15 years of planning, economic reality is forcing major replanning for the California High Speed Rail Project. In most cases this seems to be for the best. The possibility of bypassing Palmdale may be motivated to save 30 miles and time to meet the goal of 2 hour and 40 minute running times between Los Angeles and San Francisco with slower speeds in some segments than had been planned. This could be opposed by Los Angeles County Board of Supervisor Michael Antonovich  who is a major supporter of High Speed Rail and has Palmdale in his district. Antonovich is a good example of why High Speed Rail is not a  “Liberal ” issue since he is the most conservative member of the Board of Supervisors. At the very least Antonovich will demand major upgrades for faster Metrolink service in his district. NB  RailPAC eNewsletter for May 9, 2011

Posts by Category

Posts by Year

Related Articles
Newswire

Former Gavin Newsom aide picked as new California high-speed rail board chair

The  California High-Speed Rail Authority’s Board of Directors on Monday voted to elevate...

Newswire

‘This cuts my commute cost in half’: New train connects Ventura, Santa Barbara counties

VENTURA, Calif. — A new daily AMTRAK Pacific Surfliner train is now...

Newswire

An Update on Contactless Fare Payment across Agencies in California

Once Tap Plus launches later this year, it will be available on...

Newswire

Campaign to Save Bay Area Public Transit Crushes Signature Goal, Submits Over305,000 Signatures for November Ballot Measure

Fueled by major grassroots transit organizing effort and broad business and labor...